College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University
Last updated: 07 April 2022
Question 1
Two rectangular metal plates of dimensions 10 cm x 5 cm are separated by 1 mm of air, which has ϵr=1.0006. Calculate the capacitance of this structure.
The device from Question 1 is being used as a displacement sensor. The distance between the plates is varied, and the capacitance is measured. Given a measured capacitance of 5.56 pF, what is the separation distance between the plates?
Consider the capacitive strain gauge shown in Figure Q3.
For a real example of such a device, see the scanning electron microscope image in Figure 2 of this paper by Jiseok Kim et al.
The working principle of this strain gauge is that deformation of
the sensor changes the distance between the electrodes. Each pair
of electrodes forms a capacitor. The dimensions are as follows: overlap
distance v=400μm, electrode width w=40μm,
nominal separation distance d=20μm, total number of capacitors
n=200. Each capacitor is connected in parallel.
(a) Given a measured capacitance of 1.5 pF, calculate the thickness (h) of the metal electrodes above the polymer substrate. You may assume the relative permittivity is ϵr=1.
(b) Suppose that the gauge experiences a uniform strain of 0.02 in tension. Neglecting changes in electrode thickness, what will be the new capacitance?
(c) Suggest an interface circuit for this sensor using a single op-amp that will produce an output voltage whose RMS value is linearly proportional to the applied strain.
Answer
(a) Having 200 small capacitors in parallel is the same as having a single
large capacitor with a surface area that is 200 times larger. Hence
it is convenient to model this system as a single capacitor with an effective surface area A=200vh. Therefore:
(b) Strain is the relative change in length, i.e. L0ΔL=0.02. In other words, all lateral dimensions expand by a factor of 1.02.
Therefore, the new separation distance is d=20×10−6×1.02=20.4
μm, and hence the new capacitance is
Notice that this linear response is only achieved when the resistor
can be neglected in the AC analysis, i.e.
R∣∣jωCx1≈jωCx1,
which means
R≫ωCx1.
In practice you would need to choose ω and R accordingly.
Question 4
A liquid level sensor is shown below.
The electrodes are covered with a thin layer of insulating material
to avoid shorting them when a conductive liquid is being stored in
the container. The dimensions are as follows: the plate height is
hmax=100mm, the gap is d=1mm, the width
of the plates (in the direction into the page) is w=15mm,
and the liquid level is h=65mm.
(a) Given that the total capacitance is measured to be 247.5 pF, find the relative permittivity of the liquid.
(b) Suggest an interface circuit for this sensor using a single op-amp that will produce an output voltage whose RMS value is linearly proportional to the level of the liquid.
Notice that C is linearly proportional to h. Hence the impedance
is inversely proportional to h, and therefore place the sensor
in the input path of the amplifier:
Question 5
Capacitance is being measuring using the method of charge redistribution (Figure Q5).
Recall that the charge stored in a capacitor is given by Q=CV.
(a) For times t<0, S1 is closed, S2 is open, and S3 is closed. Hence
Cx charges to the reference voltage Vr, while C1
completely discharges. Write down an expression for the stored charge
in Cx.
(b) At the moment t=0, S1 is opened, S2 is closed, and S3 is opened.
Hence Cx and C1 must come to the same voltage by exchanging
charge. Using the principle of conservation of charge, calculate the
voltage V0.
(c) Extension question, which is not examinable in this subject but is surprising if you haven’t seen it before: Choose Cx=C1=C, then calculate the energy in the system for
t<0 and t>0. Recall the energy in a capacitor is W=21CV2.
Does this circuit violate conservation of energy??
Answer
(a) Only one capacitor is charged, so the stored charge is simply Q(0−)=CxVr.
(b) The same charge is now distributed across the two capacitors:
(c) Substituting Cx=C1=C into the result from part (b), the output voltage is
V0=VrC+CC=2Vr.
The initial energy (with total capacitance C) is
W(0−)=21CVr2.
However, the final energy (with total capacitance 2C) is
W(0+)=212C(2Vr)2=41CVr2.
Notice that half of the energy has disappeared! We have W(0−)=W(0+).
There are no resistive elements in the circuit yet energy is being
lost. Do you really believe in circuit theory if it contains
inconsistencies like this?
This is called the “two capacitor paradox”.
One valid solution is to connect the capacitors with a resistance
R (with the view of taking the limit of R→0 later). You will
find that no matter how small the resistance is, it will always dissipate
the same amount of heat.